(b) Reducing a Sentence for Substantial Assistance.
(1) In General. Upon the government's motion made within one year of sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant, after sentencing, provided substantial assistance in investigating or prosecuting another person.
(2) Later Motion. Upon the government's motion made more than one year after sentencing, the court may reduce a sentence if the defendant's substantial assistance involved
(A) information not known to the defendant until one year or more after sentencing;
(B) information provided by the defendant to the government within one year of sentencing, but which did not become useful to the government until more than one year after sentencing; or
(C) information the usefulness of which could not reasonably have been anticipated by the defendant until more than one year after sentencing and which was promptly provided to the government after its usefulness was reasonably apparent to the defendant.
(3) Evaluating Substantial Assistance. In evaluating whether the defendant has provided substantial assistance, the court may consider the defendant's presentence assistance.
(4) Below Statutory Minimum. When acting under Rule 35(b), the court may reduce the sentence to a level below the minimum sentence established by statute.
(c) “Sentencing” Defined. As used in this rule, “sentencing” means the oral announcement of the sentence.
28 U.S. Code § 2255.Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
If the sentence error is based upon defense attorney error and a Rule 35 motion does not work, another option would be motion under 28 U.S.C. s.2255. This statute allows for a defendant, within 1 year of when judgment becomes final, to file a motion to the district court alleging a constitutional violation within his sentence.
A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
For example, if an attorney fails to object to a section of the presentence report "PSR" and the judge sentences him based upon the PSR guideline calculation, than the attorney made a mistake and the defendant may have a claim of ineffective counsel in violation of the 6th Amendment of the Constitution.
If You Have Questions About A Jacksonville, Florida Federal Criminal Case
Please contact Clifton Law Office, you can reach me at my contact page online or call me directly at 904-209-4883.